Again and again, Washington State University professor Mesut Cicek and his colleagues fed hypotheses from scientific papers into ChatGPT and asked it to determine whether the statements had been upheld by research—whether they were true or false. They did this with more than 700 hypotheses, repeating each query 10 times.
AI gets a D: ChatGPT struggles with scientific true-or-false, study shows
-
HighlightsFree Dark Web Monitoring Stamps the $17 Million Credentials Markets
-
HighlightsSmart buildings: What happens to our free will when tech makes choices for us?
-
AppsScreenshots have generated new forms of storytelling, from Twitter fan fiction to desktop film
-
HighlightsDarknet markets generate millions in revenue selling stolen personal data, supply chain study finds
-
SecurityPrivacy violations undermine the trustworthiness of the Tim Hortons brand
-
Featured HeadlinesWhy Tesla’s Autopilot crashes spurred the feds to investigate driver-assist technologies – and what that means for the future of self-driving cars
